| Project Tasks
On the next pages, the Workpackages are
described:
1 CO-ORDINATION
2 MANAGEMENT GUIDE
3 ACER MODEL AND TOOL
4 URBER TOOL
5 BATTER MODEL
6 ENCOURAGER
7 CASES
8 DISSEMINATION
| WORKPACKAGE: |
1
CO-ORDINATION (TNO) |
| ALLOCATED COSTS: |
12% OF THE TOTAL
BUDGET |
Objectives and input to Workpackage
The project management has the total responsibility to make sure that
the entire project is carried through according to this application.
The project management has the responsibility to assure that that all
Workpackages co-operates in order to reach a comprehensive result. A
variety of co-ordination activities will be carried through during the
project.
Deliverables
Starting Document: Working
Procedures and Research Approaches
Project web site including
related activities on Internet
Midterm report
Final report
Milestones and expected results
Signing of Consortium Agreement,
Starting Document with Working Procedures and Approaches
Midterm Review: Go/No-go
decision
End report and End of Project
Back
Objectives and input to Work package
Central objective is the aim for win-win situations (for all actors at
all levels) as the key factor for success. The guide will answer the
following questions: how can sustainability in a revitalizing process be
implemented? How can such a process be managed? How can the involvement
and influence of the public and companies can be improved and increased?
What are the necessary financial resources? How can the effectiveness
and efficiency of the results be measured? What technical solutions can
be applied? The issue of land contamination will be dealt with in the
guide in a general way (how land contamination will influence the
revitalising process). NB Land contamination and remediation activities
(including planning etc.) are not the specific subject of our project.
The effects of existing land contaminations on the revitalising process
will be included. The Management Guide will consist of two parts: the
management guide (part 1) and the sourcebook (part 2):
The cases (WP7) will have a prominent input to the Management Guide.
Inputs are also expected from WP2 (Sourcebook), and WP3-WP6 (tools).
WP1 will provide working procedures.
Deliverables
Policies and Measures: Report
on current practices, including existing management guides
Management Guide
'Report on in-depth analysis of
succes/effectivity of revitalising strategies of cities
participating in MASURIN: actor- processes, instruments and policy
Milestones and expected results
Description of Best Practices
for Managing the Revitalising Process
Identification of measures for
sustainable development: tools and techniques. Presentation of the
Management Guide
Presentation of in-depth
analysis revitalisation process in participating cities.
Presentation to SAB and TSC
Back
Objectives and input to Work package
ACER will assist local authorities in selecting strategies for
socio-economic development in connection with projects for city
revitalisation. It is a software tool simulating the medium and
long-term socio-economic consequences of revitalising actions. The tool
will address both the consequences of policy at the city level and of
the implementation of specific projects in terms of the socio-economic
variables involved and the effects on the changes in land use at the
locations of projects and in the neighbourhoods that surround them. So
it is a tool, which, by way of simulating, can be used for selecting
projects and sites for sustainable urban development within the overall
socio-economic objectives of city policy, for example, enhancing the
attraction of a city centre or providing employment for the less well
educated or introducing soil contamination remediation initiatives.
Input from other Workpackages
The tool will be attuned to the other tools and will need input from
the subsequent Workpackages (WP4, WP5, WP6). Input will follow as well
from WP1 (co-ordination activities) and the cases (WP7).
Deliverables
ACER: a decision support model
for policy makers in cities to select socio-economic strategies in
accordance with local projects for city revitalisation and
sustainable urban development (6%)
Software and instruction manuals
(4%)
Milestones and expected results
The completion of an integrated
simulation tool for a city's socio-economic system and its land
use on the level of neighbourhoods
The application of this tool in
cities involved in the MASURIN initiative
The integration of the tool
with the other MASURIN tools
Back
| WORKPACKAGE: |
4
URBER
TOOL
(NILU) |
| ALLOCATED COSTS: |
12% OF THE TOTAL
BUDGET |
Objectives and input to Work package
This Workpackage aims at developing a tool
for integrated environmental assessment of the current situation and the
situation during and after the revitalising process. The tool shall
address air and water quality and noise, and will be based on an
existing tools used for assessing urban environmental situation. Input
to this tool will be industrial and urban emission inventories,
including detailed road traffic emissions and energy consumption levels,
area and land use description, water resources, meteorological, air and
water quality measurements, population distribution. The output will
give air, water and noise pollution levels in the simulated area. URBER
will be able to perform environmental assessments for new emission
scenarios proposed by BATTER and ACER tools during the revitalising
processes. The output of such scenarios will indicate effects of the
revitalising strategies simulated, which will lead to optimised
strategies for the improvement of the environment.
Input from other Work packages
The tool will be attuned to the other tools and will need input from
the subsequent Workpackages (WP3, WP5). Input will follow as well from
WP1 (co-ordination activities) and the cases (WP7).
Deliverables
URBER, the software tool
designed to calculate the environmental impacts of today's
situation and of the socio-economic scenarios developed with the
ACER tool. (Da)
Manual and description of the
main functionalities of the tool. (Re)
Results of the evaluation of
the demonstrator. (De)
Milestones and expected results
Modified version of ENSIS
Emission and discharge
inventories ready
Manuals and documentation of
URBER ready
Demonstration of URBER on one
of the Cities
Back
| WORKPACKAGE: |
5
BATTER MODEL
(ENEA) |
| ALLOCATED COSTS: |
9% OF THE TOTAL
BUDGET |
Objectives and input to Work package
BATTER will support local authorities in selecting the best techniques
to revitalize the industrial part of the urban site; its use can also
support the revitalisation of larger territories. BATTER will be based
on the approaches of the " BEST AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES" (BAT)
and "Reference Installation". The BAT is meant to be a
techno-economic description of less polluting technical options to
substitute or integrate the present process. The "Reference
Installation" is an approach that allows dividing installations
into homogeneous categories. It is necessary to solve the problems posed
by the significant differences between installations due to sizes,
capacity, and applied processes. BATTER is a tool assessing, in an
integrated way, the pollution reduction that can be achieved adopting a
BAT or a BAT combination, and the related costs, (investments, operating,
and other costs coming from the susceptibility of companies to adopt
BAT), whether for a territory or for a single installation. The
application and implementation of best available technology is strongly
influenced by the distribution and acceptance of information. Driving
forces of these factors is the culture and strategy of the involved
companies and the education of responsible and employees. An essential
precondition for a successful realisation of innovation strategies is
therefore the identification of innovation state of companies involved
in the revitalisation process. During the EC project MOSES an indicative
method for the identification of companies' strategies in relation to
regional innovation processes was developed. This methodological tool
can be adapted and modified for application in revitalisation processes.
Deliverables
The BAT approach: state of the
art (methodology for description and modelling)
The BATTER model: development,
description and explanation
Demonstration in cases:
analysis of cases of environmental improvements obtained through
co-operation between single installations
Milestones and expected results
Report of the survey on BAT
state of art
Description and explanation of
the BATTER method: manual
Report on the results of the
BATTER application in the cases
Back
| WORKPACKAGE: |
6
ENCOURAGER
(INERIS) |
| ALLOCATED COSTS: |
7% OF THE TOTAL
BUDGET |
Objectives and input to Work package
This work package aims at developing a decision tool that will help
local authorities define their strategies to encourage enterprises, as a
whole and specifically, to co-operate in the sustainable development
management process of an - existing, to be revitalised or in project -
industrial park by offering or showing them the possible benefits (reduction
of operational costs, of taxes, of insurances, improvement of corporate
image, of relationship with neighbourhood, etc.). The research program
will take into account the will of local authorities to minimise the
overall impact of an industrial park, while optimising the gain for each
of the companies in the cluster they formed. The tool should take as
inputs the objectives for the industrial park defined by local
authorities resulting from the application of the URBER tool, the list
of companies involved, their specific characteristics, as well as data
dealing with the local context. He will also use BATTER to optimise
processes in the different enterprises and between two or more of them
(i.e. utilisation of heat excess or by-products or wastes valorisation).
It will give as outputs the overall strategy that should be applied for
the industrial park and the particular strategy that should be used when
dealing with each company. The results will be used as inputs by the
ACER tool in order to assess the socio-economic consequences of the
strategy chosen.
Input from other Workpackages
The tool will be attuned to the other tools and will need inputs from
the subsequent Work packages (WP3, WP4, WP5). Input will follow as
well from WP1 (co-ordination activities) and the cases (WP7).
Deliverables
ENCOURAGER, a tool designed to
help local authorities to define their strategies for companies'
motivation
A notice to explain the main
tool's functionalities
Milestones and expected results
Report on existing industrial
areas, existing options and common hardships as well as best
results achieved
Definition of strategies to
encourage enterprises
Completion of a multi-criteria
tool will lead to a practical decision support tool
Back
| WORKPACKAGE: |
7
CASES
(GIG) |
| ALLOCATED COSTS: |
22% OF THE TOTAL
BUDGET |
Objectives and input to Work package
To improve the results of this project it is foreseen that the partner
cities will start a revitalising process, introducing MASURIN activities.
On the other hand the cities will participate in the development of the
MASURIN project with their experience, knowledge of the site and other
specific information that will serve as inputs to the models and tools
to be developed. The cases are therefore part of the research approach
and assure sustainable of the city industrial sites based on existing
examples. The research partners will assist the local authorities to
develop a Master plan, including a work plan for actions and strategy, a
monitoring approach and preliminary cost assessment.
Description of the work
The cases will take as initial data description of the specific
problems (aspects) of industrial sides of the large and medium six
cities with different characteristics, different level of development
and located in different regions of Europe.
Deliverables
For each city an analysis of
strengths and weaknesses of present and past revitalising
processes (5%)
For each city a specific
strategic model and targets (3%)
Input reports for verification
and development of tools (4%)
Case specific Master plans (9%)
Milestones and expected results
Case specific analysis on
present and past revitalising strategy and methods used
Case specific ambition levels
and targets set
Case specific translation of
project results into Master plans that can be used in the future
Back
| WORKPACKAGE: |
8
DISSEMINATION
(INERIS) |
| ALLOCATED COSTS: |
6% OF THE TOTAL
BUDGET |
Objectives and input to Work package
This Workpackage must ensure that the results of the project and the
tools developed will be known and potentially used all around Europe.
The dissemination process will use different means of communication in
order to touch a large public. Communication actions will take place
from the beginning of the project, all through the first second, and
third year with publications and conferences, until the tools have been
completed and the first results of revitalisation processes in cities
achieved. Dissemination will logically accelerate during the last six
months of the project. First dissemination actions will take as inputs
the contents and objectives of the projects, and the benefits that could
be gained from a revitalisation process. Contacts with potential users
or interested parties through the first step of dissemination will give
an opportunity to orientate the work depending on their needs expressed
during this stage. As soon as the tools are completed and the
revitalisation processes give their first results, communication will
focus on these tools and results.
Deliverables
Five International conferences
Installation of website pages
per case, including a discussion forum
Publications in professional
magazines and participations to professional meetings and
presentations of MASURIN results and tools for Ministries of
Environment or other organisations
Development of national courses/workshops
on sustainable revitalisation of the research partners in
collaboration with the cities
Milestones and expected results
 |
First International conference
will present the project, give information about the
socio-economic benefits that could be gained and gather data from
the experience of the participants |
 |
2nd International conference
promotes exchange about the sustainable management of urban
industrial sites |
 |
Opening the website to public
will provide information about the project in free access for the
public |
 |
3rd and 4th International
Conference will provide information about the tests of the tools
developed and the first results achieved on a technical as well as
an economical point of view |
 |
5th International conference
will present the final results, and potential further development |
 |
National days and workshops as
well as publications in professional magazines all through the
project will ensure a large public is touched, and contacts with
the partners are possible and encouraged
|
Back
|